Register  | Login

Thursday, Aug. 21 11:59  

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
MinimizeFamily Crest
 
 

Lupton Family 'Crest' or Coat of Arms - Is it real?

The minimal amount of research I have done into this has led me to believe basically... it doesn't really matter.  Anyone could and can create a coat of arms for their use and the article below from Fleurdelis.com provides a pretty good history (see the links in the article as well).  The more confusing issue for our  is the authenticity of the origins of the Lupton family surname.  Many (and more specifically Americans), and I think mistakenly, claim that the name is derived from the Latin word 'Lupus' meaning wolf; however, the best explanation I have read regarding its origin had to do with the French pronunciation for an area in England known as 'uptown'; Le' Upton or L'Upton leading me also to believe that the origin of the Lupton and Upton surnames are the same.  I also understand that this particular 'uptown' area was essentially 'the other side of the track'. Given that the folk in this area were certainly not of royal descent, it is highly unlikely that any ancestral coat of arms was granted to a 'Lupton'.  When I locate the original article regarding the history of the French origin of the Lupton name, I'll add that information to the site.

The Term "Family Crest" -- A Problem of Semantics?
(Extract taken from http://www.fleurdelis.com/nofamilycrest.htm)

Confusion over the term "family crest" probably arose from an understandable abbreviation of the terminology in heraldry for an important part of a coat of arms. One of the most respected sources for heraldry information is Fairbairn's Book of Crests of the Families of Great Britain and Ireland, first published in 1859 and revised over the years in various reprints. (The current version is published by the Genealogical Publishing Co., Inc. in Baltimore, Maryland.) It is not difficult to see how the use of the term "crest" could have become synonymous in common use with the term "coat of arms," since one is a part of the other (see A Brief History of Heraldry and the Parts of a "Coat of Arms" or "Family Crest".) Through time, "the crest" has been associated with family names, independent of the coat of arms, in such publications as Fairbairn's.

Gaelic tradition allows family members to use of the "crest" part of an entire coat of arms (that which appears above the shield) in a badge setting (a circular belt), thus all members of a given clan are entitled to use the clan badge. Indeed, the crest part of a coat of arms has been used on engravings, rings, bookplates, and other means of displaying one's heritage for many years. Perhaps this is due to their relative simplicity in relation to the full coat of arms. However, authorities claim that they were never intended to be used alone, without the remainder of the official coat of arms.

A previous editor of that esteemed "Fairbairn" book described the "crest" as "that part of the complete achievement which is placed upon and surmounts the coronet, wreath, or chapeau, which in its turn is above the mantling or lambrequin which it is supposed to attach to the helmet." For more information and an illustration, please see A Brief History of Heraldry and the Parts of a Coat of Arms.

 

Coats of Arms and Crests Belong to Individuals, Not Surnames

Coats of arms are not awarded to a family or a name, but to an individual. This is why there is no coat of arms or family crest for the family name "Hardin" -- only a coat of arms and crest granted to someone with that name many years ago. This is why there is often more than one coat of arms associated with a given surname. See the various Hardin arms from different countries and regions. In England, direct descent is required for any heir to have the legal right to bear his ancestor's coat of arms.

You can try to narrow the search by geographic region of origin, but there may also be more than one coat of arms awarded to several people in ancient Germany. Further complicating the issue is that the authoritative source information for most coats of arms only lists a city and/or county or origin, and sometimes only a country.

 

That is why, unless you can trace your family history to one individual, and unless the sources list that individual, then the best that you can hope for is to find a coat of arms that is the oldest for a given name from a given region or the one most frequently used. Coats of arms usually started out fairly simple in design, then subsequent generations added onto or made slight variations to the design to make it their own. Marriages often resulted in a combination of two different family lines' coats of arms.

You can also try contacting the College of Arms for the country you believe your ancestor is from, and for a fee they will search their records to see if a coat of arms was awarded to your ancestor.

The bearing of coats of arms is not regulated in most countries, including the United States, thus there has been a proliferation of "family name" companies offering histories and coats of arms for a given surname. While there is no reason we cannot enjoy the decoration of a coat of arms associated with someone centuries ago who shared our surname, we should be aware that this is all that it is -- a decoration.

There is also no reason we cannot create a coat of arms and crest for ourselves, whether based on the coat of arms of an ancestor who shared our name (and may or may not be related to us), or designed from scratch to mean something special to our own lives and family.

 

Terms Of Use  |  Privacy Statement  

 Copyright 2007 - Lupton.Net